The Argument From Repetition is a logical fallacy that occurs when a statement is assumed to be true simply because it has been repeated often enough. This fallacy is also known as the argumentum ad nauseam, which means to the point of nausea. The idea behind this fallacy is that if a statement is repeated enough times, people will start to believe it, regardless of whether it is true or not. The Argument From Repetition is often used in advertising, politics, and propaganda. Advertisers repeat their slogans and catchphrases in the hopes that consumers will remember and buy their products. Politicians repeat their talking points in the hopes that voters will remember and support their campaigns. Propagandists repeat their messages in the hopes of convincing people to adopt their ideologies. However, repetition does not necessarily make a statement true. In fact, repeating a false statement over and over again can create an illusion of truth, even if the statement is completely baseless. This is why it is important to always fact-check and critically evaluate the information we receive, rather than simply accepting it because we have heard it before. In conclusion, the Argument From Repetition is a logical fallacy that occurs when a statement is assumed to be true simply because it has been repeated often enough. It is a dangerous fallacy that can be used to spread false information and manipulate public opinion. It is important to always critically evaluate the information we receive and not simply accept it because we have heard it before.
logical fallacy, ad nauseam, advertising, politics, propaganda, fact-checking, critical evaluation
Argument From Repetition is a type of logical fallacy that people use when they are trying to make a point. It happens when someone keeps repeating the same thing over and over in an attempt to make it sound true, even if it is not. This can be dangerous because people can believe something is true without checking the facts. It is important to always look at the evidence and decide for yourself if something is true or not.
Argument from Repetition, Cognitive Biases, Logical Fallacies, Misinformation
CITATION : "Thomas Lee. 'Argument From Repetition.' Design+Encyclopedia. https://design-encyclopedia.com/?E=214481 (Accessed on May 09, 2024)"
The Argument From Repetition is a logical fallacy whereby a conclusion is assumed to be true because it has been repeated often enough. It is a form of appeal to popularity and is closely related to the ad populum fallacy. This type of argument is based on the assumption that repetition of a statement increases its validity, when in fact, it does not. The fallacy is often used to spread false information and to manipulate public opinion, as repetition can create an illusion of truth. It is also used to promote various agendas and to discredit opposing views.
Argument From Repetition, Cognitive Biases, Logical Fallacies, Appeal to Popularity, Ad Populum Fallacy.
We have 178.961 Topics and 427.322 Entries and Argument From Repetition has 3 entries on Design+Encyclopedia. Design+Encyclopedia is a free encyclopedia, written collaboratively by designers, creators, artists, innovators and architects. Become a contributor and expand our knowledge on Argument From Repetition today.